I’ve mentioned several times over the last few weeks that I’m new to this whole technology thing. I never even thought about how search engine companies (the most popular being Google and Yahoo) stay in business, I just knew they did. I assumed it was through advertising, but I never dwelled on their existence. A few weeks ago, I learned that many companies pay for placement on search engine web sites. I’m not the only one (thankfully) as I also learned that 60% of Americans are not aware of this practice. So basically, when I enter “West Virginia University” into Google’s search engine, the University’s web-site is not the first site listed on the results page. Some company selling football paraphernalia is listed at the top of the list under a small heading “sponsor results.” This means that some company pays for placement at the top of the results page and the site I’m actually looking for, is forth on the list.
Now this isn’t a problem, as I know that wvu.edu is the web site for West Virginia University, but what if I’m Christmas shopping and looking for Hannah Montana paraphernalia? If I get over one million results, rest assured, I’m not going to look through all of them. Several companies, who pay money to the search engine site, will be listed at the top of the results. Those are the ones I’m going to look through, not number 649,278 on the list. But what if the results at the top of the page do not have the best selections or the best deals? Is it fair to me to put a company at the top of the list which is not offering the best? Often the companies at the top of the results list are affiliated with the search engine company (same parent group). Is this fair or objective?
Now if consumers are aware of this practice, then I see very little issue, but 60% of Americans are surfing the web with no knowledge of this? Is that ethical? If not, who is being unethical, the search engine company or the advertising company? Are they both to blame? Please let me know how which side of this argument you fall on.